photo by Sandra Dodd

It seems to me that "phonics" essentially serves the purpose of "teaching" a child to read before he's ready and fully grasps context and meaning. I know that I can read Spanish, which is a much more consistently phonetic language than English, complete with accent and everything, and literally not understand one bit of what I'm saying.I remember being tested separately for "reading" and reading comprehension. If one can't understand the words and phrases, then isn't it just decoding with an internalized phonics decoder ring?
The cleaning up of making a cake is just part of the whole process of cake making—isn't it? Am I making any sense?Joyce Fetteroll responded:
Yes, your question makes perfect sense.There was more, and it's good. Sweet and messy.
It might help you see it more clearly if you ask yourself what your goal is. Is the goal to have a clean kitchen or the experience of making a cake? If the goal is a clean kitchen, then it's better not to have children! 😉


I personally believe that most knowledge, no matter how trivial or useless to anyone else, is just as important as what most people consider useful knowledge.I responded:
This is dangerously radical thought and I agree with it wholeheartedly.
If one person builds muscle under the direction of a coach using gym equipment, and another builds muscle chopping wood and doing yardwork, which is better? Which muscles are more real? Which muscles are more useful? Which are more moral? What does the person need muscles for? Was the activity engaged in for the purpose of building visible, oilable muscles?
When schools teach to the test and drill kids on "useful" information, what happens inside and outside the school, the teacher, the student, the parent?
Let's try it, or
I'll help you, or
Okay, yes.

